Thanks you Emmanuel, I know enough. I will propose our team to migrate to Linux!
-----Original Message----- From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 November 2007 08:35 To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: continuum 1.1-beta-4 on Windows 2000? I don't have a windows 2000 to test. I have an instance there with more than 100 projects on win XP and it works fine and at ASF (http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/) an instance on Linux that works fine too. Emmanuel VanIngen, Erik (ESTG) a écrit : > We are very enthousiastic about Continuum. But Continuum on Windows > 2000 is in our configuration not stable. More or less every week an > instability occurs. Our configuration is plain and very > straightforward. We build 4 projects which takes about 10 minutes (3 > java projects and 1 web project). The schedule is every hour. There > are threads or processes remaining which are breaking the build of the > next hour. And thereofore we consider Continuum on Windows 2000 as not > stable. We did play with memory settings. It might be very well stable > on other platforms. In fact we are considering moving to Linux. The > question is, will that solve our problems? > > Erik van Ingen > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 06 November 2007 14:18 > To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org > Subject: Re: continuum 1.1-beta-4 on Windows 2000? > > > Continuum is stable, but the stability can depends on lot of things > (nb projects, schedule interval, build time average by project, > memory, > processor....) > > Emmanuel > > VanIngen, Erik (ESTG) a écrit : >> Hi continuum, >> >> We are working fine with continuum 1.1-beta-3 on Windows 2000. The >> only annoying thing is that instability things keep happening like >> described below. The reason is that some java processes or threads of >> Continuum are remaining and locking resources. >> >> We don't want to upgrade to continuum 1.1-beta-4, unless it is >> resolving stability issues like below. Am I right to say that beta-4 >> in not improving the stability of Continuum? >> >> Kind Regards, >> Erik >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: VanIngen, Erik (ESTG) >> Sent: 05 November 2007 09:24 >> To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org >> Subject: Build Error: svn: Working copy '.' locked >> >> >> Hi continuum, >> >> We are using continuum 1.1-beta-3 on Windows 2000. It is working fine >> but today all of the sudden there is this message: >> >> ********************************************************************* >> * >> ****** >> Build Error: >> > ********************************************************************** > ****** >> Provider message: The svn command failed. >> Command output: >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > ------- >> -- >> svn: Working copy '.' locked >> svn: run 'svn cleanup' to remove locks (type 'svn help cleanup' for > details) >> Type 'svn help' for usage. >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > ------- >> -- >> >> Does anyone have any idea how to solve this? >> >> Kind Regards, >> Erik van Ingen >> >> >
