One never knows which butterfly wing-flap will start a fascinating
discussion or result in someone's leap forward.  Thanks, all, for the rich
discussion and fresh thoughts.

Rob

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Robert Matson
Innovation Media Corp.
The Innovation Works, Inc.
Cell: (917) 626-2675



On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 1:51 PM Erik Hoffman via Contra Callers <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I did something similar to Diane Silver in my “deep collection” period,
> the difference was I recorded every dance I attended—with permission, of
> course. Then, when I became the house caller in San Luis Obispo, I’d use
> the hour-and-a-half drive from my home in Santa Barbara, to listen to the
> dances and scrawl the choreography on the way. Saved me from the missing
> the walk-through. One advantage of this, I also caught the teaching. I’d
> have times when I’d say, “that description didn’t work that well,” or,
> “that was a great way to teach that dance.”
>
>
>
> Thus, I recording dances, with that permission first. You get to go
> through a walk-through, feel what is like to go through the teaching, then
> re-live it when listening to the recording as you transcribe the dance. I’d
> also get to enjoy the music and process the dance. OK, I’m not recommending
> writing while driving, but finding a time to listen, transcribe, and review
> your experience. It’s a great way to learn, at least for
>
>
>
> Another technique I tell students to is when the caller stops calling,
> call the dance as dancing. Call under your breath if calling is not needed,
> call out loud if your in a trouble spot. This is a way to feel how the
> place the timing of the call to end on the phrase preceding the motion.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Erik Hoffman
>
>   Of Santa Barbara, now in Oakland, CA
>
>
>
> *From:* Diane Silver <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Monday, January 13, 2025 10:27 AM
> *To:* Erik Hoffman <[email protected]>
> *Cc:* Shared Weight - Contra Callers <[email protected]
> >
> *Subject:* Re: [Callers] Re: Unifying contra dance formats with AI
>
>
>
>
>
> Any teacher will tell you that engaging with the material leads to
> mastery. It's why authentic, problem-based learning is considered better
> than book-learning, and it's also why, at the very least, you were assigned
> study guides or outlines or such when you were in school -- forcing you to
> re-write info from the textbook, rather than just reading it.
>
> Most of my collection is dances I collected by dancing them myself. When I
> was starting out, I was in deep collection mode, and kept a little notebook
> in my dance bag. I'd finish a dance, get my next partner, then scurry over
> to my notebook to jot down the dance we just did before I forgot it, then
> scurry back to the line before the music started. I often missed the
> walk-through, but I figured, if I can't dance without a walk-through, I
> have no business trying to be a caller. Then at home I'd transcribe the
> scribbles onto cards. I have no doubt that that process helped me as a new
> caller. I have often wondered if it's really a service to new callers when
> they ask to just take a picture of my card. The teacher in me wants to take
> the road of tough love and make them do the same work I did, but I usually
> let them just have it because they haven't asked for that level of
> mentorship.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 5:01 PM Erik Hoffman via Contra Callers <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> From Louise Siddons:
>
> Also, specifically in terms of programming (which someone mentioned),
> there are aspects of calling where experience is a key element of the
> learning process. Shortcuts will be detrimental to the caller’s experience
> even if the dancers don’t notice.
>
>
>
> From me:
>
> This is much like late Larry Jennings’ decision to transcribe dances in
> his book, *Zesty Contras* and *Give-and-Take* with abbreviations and in a
> form that was not common in the time. His thinking was people using his
> books would have to think about the dance they were planning to call had to
> think about the dance as they re-transcribed it. I recall the challenge of
> putting dances down on a card (remember those?) (and I know people still
> use cards…) from *Zesty Contras* and doing just what Larry intended:
> thinking a dance through as I put it down in my re-abbreviated cards.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> ~Erik Hoffman
>
>         Oakland CA
>
>
>
> *From:* Louise Siddons via Contra Callers <
> [email protected]>
> *Sent:* Sunday, January 12, 2025 12:35 PM
> *To:* Shared Weight Contra Callers <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* [Callers] Re: Unifying contra dance formats with AI
>
>
>
>
>
> AI is resource-intensive and an environmental disaster. Using it for
> trivial purposes feels worse than pointless to me.
>
>
>
> Also, specifically in terms of programming (which someone mentioned),
> there are aspects of calling where experience is a key element of the
> learning process. Shortcuts will be detrimental to the caller’s experience
> even if the dancers don’t notice.
>
>
>
> In the spirit of slow food, might we not consider ‘slow folk dance’ as
> taking a positive, sustainable position in relation to the climate crisis?
> There is no actual need to make anything related to contra dancing more
> efficient.
>
>
>
> (I’m reminded of the joke that dancing is a very complicated way of going
> nowhere. Surely in some sense we embody the idea that the journey is the
> destination?)
>
>
>
> Louise.
>
> (Winchester, UK)
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Contra Callers mailing list -- [email protected]
>
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Contra Callers mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Contra Callers mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to