Ahoi controller-dev and others who may have an idea (please + anyone else applicable),
How do you write an AbstractDataBrokerTest and in it wait for a put on the DataBroker to have processed by all of its registered DataTreeChangeListener ? Background with concrete example: The (Abstract)AclServiceTest in https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/42109/ (see [1]) puts two entries into the DataBroker, the 2nd of which triggers a DataTreeChangeListener which ultimately calls some service. The test asserts that this service got called (slightly simplified, but that's the gist of that test). I've inserted a Thread.sleep(500) after the DataBroker put and before the assert, to give the DataTreeChangeListener a chance - I understand runs asynchronously, right? This sleep makes that test work just fine (contrary to without any sleep, when it fails, but just sometimes; that's always fun) - but I'm wondering if there would be better way to write these kind of tests, without sleep ... but not quite clear in my mind yet how. I've written tests like this before, using e.g. https://github.com/awaitility/awaitility, which is just a nice utility to poll say every 100ms for max. 2s for a certain condition to be true - but what is that condition in this scenario - what API / helper would one use to ask a DataBroker "have all of your listeners already processed all of your pending puts" ? If this is impossible as is today, would this seem like a fair enhancement request - would you consider adding something like this, specifically to aid in writing tests? [1] (Abstract)AclServiceTest is an AbstractDataBrokerTest, even if it doesn't extend AbstractDataBrokerTest; ignore that, it's just because of https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/43645/ Thanks a lot, M. -- Michael Vorburger <vorbur...@redhat.com> | IRC: vorburger @freenode | ~ = http://vorburger.ch
_______________________________________________ controller-dev mailing list controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev
