Thanks for checking and encouraging me to check :) Ed
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Luis Gomez <ece...@gmail.com> wrote: > Correction, you are right both ports are open :) > > On Aug 31, 2016, at 3:30 PM, Luis Gomez <ece...@gmail.com> wrote: > > OK, then something happened after because today 8181 is the port everybody > uses and 8080 is not even open. > > > On Aug 31, 2016, at 12:18 PM, Edward Warnicke <hagb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It did :) > > https://github.com/opendaylight/odlparent/blob/master/karaf/opendaylight- > karaf-resources/src/main/resources/etc/jetty.xml#L58 > > I know... I'm the one who did it: > https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/13546/ > > (a lot of work actually went into moving RESTCONF to 8080, because for > backward compatibility it also meant making neutron work with jetty.xml, > because neutron northbound wasn't being deprecated :) ). > > Ed > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Luis Gomez <ece...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> If the plan was to shift RESTCONF back to 8080, I do not think that ever >> happened :) >> >> On Aug 31, 2016, at 11:52 AM, Edward Warnicke <hagb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Huh... I remember slightly differently... because the 8080 for the old >> ADSAL couldn't coexist with the RESTCONF, which is why RESTCONF originally >> went on 8181... once ADSAL was deprecated, *then* RESTCONF shifted to the >> 8080 port, with 8181 retained for backward compatibility (I *think* I was >> the one to do all that work... but its a bit murky in my mind). >> >> Ed >> >> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Luis Gomez <ece...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I think it is the other way around: 8181 is the "official" RESTCONF port >>> and 8080 was used before in ADSAL and kept for API backwards compatibility >>> reasons. >>> >>> On Aug 31, 2016, at 5:57 AM, Edward Warnicke <hagb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> 8080 is the primary port... 8181 was a historical artifact. >>> >>> Ed >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 3:18 AM, navin.kukr...@suse.com < >>> navin.kukr...@suse.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Why do we have two ports in etc/jetty.xml file? >>>> >>>> I installed Beryllium on a server but I am running another service on >>>> port 8080 and when I load dlux feature, it stays in graceperiod because >>>> port 8080 is unavailable. I completely removed 'addConnector' section for >>>> port 8080 from etc/jetty.xml file and it worked. >>>> >>>> Is port 8080 just a abckup port for web portal? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Navin >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> controller-dev mailing list >>>> controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org >>>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> controller-dev mailing list >>> controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org >>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > >
_______________________________________________ controller-dev mailing list controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev
