Hi Robert, 

I searched around if there are any specific definition of 'nearest' in RFC - 
but could not find one. So, in case of symmetric deployment (or as mentioned by 
Guy in case of multiple RoutedRPC being registered with same route-key across 
the cluster), nearest could only imply network-local  - in which case, current 
implementation of local routing satisfies the requirement - right ?



Regards
Muthu

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Varga [mailto:n...@hq.sk] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 6:20 PM
To: Sela, Guy <guy.s...@hpe.com>; Muthukumaran K <muthukumara...@ericsson.com>; 
controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org; mdsal-...@lists.opendaylight.org
Subject: Re: [controller-dev] Global RPCs aren't delegated in a cluster?

On 11/29/2016 01:47 PM, Sela, Guy wrote:
> Great, but as I understand from these bugs:
> https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6310
> https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3128
> 
> Global RPC today has a bug that it is not routed to the nearest registered 
> implementation inside a cluster, and therefore I need to use a RoutedRPC as a 
> workaround.
> Right?

Correct, and we need to fix the clustered implementation.

Regards,
Robert

_______________________________________________
controller-dev mailing list
controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev

Reply via email to