Hi Robert, I searched around if there are any specific definition of 'nearest' in RFC - but could not find one. So, in case of symmetric deployment (or as mentioned by Guy in case of multiple RoutedRPC being registered with same route-key across the cluster), nearest could only imply network-local - in which case, current implementation of local routing satisfies the requirement - right ?
Regards Muthu -----Original Message----- From: Robert Varga [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 6:20 PM To: Sela, Guy <[email protected]>; Muthukumaran K <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [controller-dev] Global RPCs aren't delegated in a cluster? On 11/29/2016 01:47 PM, Sela, Guy wrote: > Great, but as I understand from these bugs: > https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6310 > https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3128 > > Global RPC today has a bug that it is not routed to the nearest registered > implementation inside a cluster, and therefore I need to use a RoutedRPC as a > workaround. > Right? Correct, and we need to fix the clustered implementation. Regards, Robert _______________________________________________ controller-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev
