Hi
I totally agree with you that it might indicate there is a cleanup code that 
runs in an un-coordinated fashion.
There is no value in explaining what causes this problem in this specific case, 
because it is probably solvable.
My point was the bigger picture, should we even solve this ? Is this even a 
problem that a developer needs to think of?
If you allow "permissive" mode to delete operations, you basically allow the 
developer to say - I don't care if someone else is concurrently cleaning up the 
same part I'm cleaning, it's doesn't matter to me. As long as it will be 
deleted in the end, that's fine by me.
This will not be the default mode, default mode would behave as today.

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Varga [mailto:n...@hq.sk] 
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 12:06 PM
To: Sela, Guy <guy.s...@hpe.com>; controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org; 
mdsal-...@lists.opendaylight.org; Tom Pantelis <tompante...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Deleting a node from MD-SAL that doesn't exist / already deleted

On 01/20/2017 10:13 AM, Sela, Guy wrote:
> My suggestion was not to change the current delete, but to add to it 
> another flag, which will "silence" the exceptions in the case where 
> the transaction started when the Node existed, and ended when it didn't exist 
> anymore. Default behavior would stay the same. Cleanup code can potentially 
> do the same deletion twice, and I think it makes sense to allow it to pass 
> this "permissive" flag.

Sorry, an operation with a flag means the operation is split into two distinct 
operations.

Also the scenario described means that the cleanup code is running in an 
un-coordinated fashion, more importantly it seems to indicate un-ordered 
shutdown of multiple components which trip over each others cleanup.

Can you describe, best with the corresponding model, the order of operations 
which trigger the exception?

Regards,
Robert

_______________________________________________
controller-dev mailing list
controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev

Reply via email to