On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Tom Pantelis <tompante...@gmail.com> wrote:
Unfortunately usage of CSS in sal-distributed-datastore, sal-dom-broker-config > et al needs to remain until it is decided to completely remove CSS, > Oh. Just for me to learn more about controller, would you have a moment to elaborate further why we cannot start with removing controller's own use of CSS now already? It shouldn't break any of the ODL projects (as none of them use CSS anymore) - what am I missing? > which we're targeting for Flourine. > OK, I see. FYI, I just spent a moment looking more at the POMs and all, and have started a serious of 4 draft patches for this, but will stop now, based on your reply. But I'll add you as a Reviewer on those drafts, in case (a) you think some of them could be of interest to merge sooner rather than later (even if they need a bit more work) or (b) if this could be a basis we could pick up on at the start of Flourine. > I have cleaned up CSS from most projects participating in Nitrogen. > Cool, thanks, that's a start. PS: Now I have to figure out how to solve https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9068 without touching controller CSS... On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Michael Vorburger <vorbur...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> Hello controllers, >> >> while starting to see how to solve https://bugs.opendaylight.org/ >> show_bug.cgi?id=9068, I realized that those are CSS related problems... >> but we anway don't need / use CSS anymore, on master, do we? >> >> There may be other reload problems after for the scenario of Bug 9068, >> but would it be a good idea and a welcome contribution if I were to propose >> a Gerrite to at least already remove the remaining use of config-parent >> from sal-distributed-datastore, sal-clustering-commons and >> sal-dom-broker-config (what is that?) and messagebus-impl? >> >> I would love leave still leave config/config-parent & Co. in controller, >> for the moment, as even if we rid controller itself from any CSS >> completely, I don't know what use other projects still make of it - >> cleaning that up could be a subsequent next step to above. >> >> Or is this not as a simple as I think it could be (not "just" replacing >> some config-parent by binding-parent), or we actually somehow still use CSS >> a bit, so can't do? >> >> Tx, >> M. >> -- >> Michael Vorburger, Red Hat >> vorbur...@redhat.com | IRC: vorburger @freenode | ~ = http://vorburger.ch >> >
_______________________________________________ controller-dev mailing list controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev
