is it possible to collect dmesg output? That can give an idea if it's a JVM
native OOM.

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Michael Vorburger <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:02 PM, Jamo Luhrsen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 10/31/2017 12:22 AM, Michael Vorburger wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 12:44 AM, Jamo Luhrsen <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     On 10/30/2017 01:29 PM, Tom Pantelis wrote:
>> >     > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Sam Hague <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
>> >     <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
>> >     >     On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Tom Pantelis <
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> >     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
>> wrote:
>> >     >         On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Michael Vorburger <
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
>> >     >
>> >     >             Hi Sam,
>> >     >
>> >     >             On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Sam Hague <
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
>> >     >
>> >     >                 Stephen, Michael, Tom,
>> >     >
>> >     >                 do you have any ways to collect debugs when ODL
>> crashes in CSIT?
>> >     >
>> >     >
>> >     >             JVMs (almost) never "just crash" without a word...
>> either some code does java.lang.System.exit(), which you may
>> >     >             remember we do in the CDS/Akka code somewhere, or
>> there's a bug in the JVM implementation - in which case there
>> >     >             should be a one of those JVM crash logs type things -
>> a file named something like hs_err_pid22607.log in the
>> >     >             "current working" directory. Where would that be on
>> these CSIT runs, and are the CSIT JJB jobs set up to preserve
>> >     >             such JVM crash log files and copy them over to
>> logs.opendaylight.org <http://logs.opendaylight.org>
>> >     <http://logs.opendaylight.org> ?
>> >     >
>> >     >
>> >     >         Akka will do System.exit() if it encounters an error
>> serious for that.  But it doesn't do it silently. However I
>> >     >         believe we disabled the automatic exiting in akka.
>> >     >
>> >     >     Should there be any logs in ODL for this? There is nothing in
>> the karaf log when this happens. It literally just stops.
>> >     >
>> >     >     The karaf.console log does say the karaf process was killed:
>> >     >
>> >     >     /tmp/karaf-0.7.1-SNAPSHOT/bin/karaf: line 422: 11528 Killed
>> ${KARAF_EXEC} "${JAVA}" ${JAVA_OPTS} "$NON_BLOCKING_PRNG"
>> >     >     -Djava.endorsed.dirs="${JAVA_ENDORSED_DIRS}"
>> -Djava.ext.dirs="${JAVA_EXT_DIRS}"
>> >     >     -Dkaraf.instances="${KARAF_HOME}/instances"
>> -Dkaraf.home="${KARAF_HOME}" -Dkaraf.base="${KARAF_BASE}"
>> >     >     -Dkaraf.data="${KARAF_DATA}" -Dkaraf.etc="${KARAF_ETC}"
>> -Dkaraf.restart.jvm.supported=true
>> >     >     -Djava.io.tmpdir="${KARAF_DATA}/tmp"
>> -Djava.util.logging.config.file="${KARAF_BASE}/etc/java.util
>> .logging.properties"
>> >     >     ${KARAF_SYSTEM_OPTS} ${KARAF_OPTS} ${OPTS} "$@" -classpath
>> "${CLASSPATH}" ${MAIN}
>> >     >
>> >     >     In the CSIT robot files we can see the below connection
>> errors so ODL is not responding to new requests. This plus the
>> >     >     above lead to think ODL just died.
>> >     >
>> >     >     [ WARN ] Retrying (Retry(total=2, connect=None, read=None,
>> redirect=None, status=None)) after connection broken by
>> >     >     
>> > 'NewConnectionError('<requests.packages.urllib3.connection.HTTPConnection
>> object at 0x5ca2d50>: Failed to establish a new
>> >     >     connection: [Errno 111] Connection refused',)'
>> >     >
>> >     >
>> >     >
>> >     > That would seem to indicate something did a kill -9.  As Michael
>> said, if the JVM crashed there would be an hs_err_pid file
>> >     > and it would log a message about it
>> >
>> >     yeah, this is where my money is at as well. The OS must be dumping
>> it because it's
>> >     misbehaving. I'll try to hack the job to start collecting os level
>> log info (e.g. journalctl, etc)
>> >
>> >
>> > JamO, do make sure you collect not just OS level but also the
>> JVM's hs_err_*.log  file (if any); my bet is a JVM more than an
>> > OS level crash...
>>
>> where are these hs_err_*.log files going to be?
>
>
> they would be in the "current working directory", like what was the "pwd"
> when the JVM was started..
>
>
>> This is such a dragged out process to debug. These
>> jobs take 3+ hours and our problem only comes sporadically. ...sigh...
>>
>> But, good news is that I think we've confirmed it's an oom. but an OOM
>> from the OS perspective,
>> if I'm not mistaken.
>>
>
> OK that kind of thing could happen if you ran an ODL JVM in this kind of
> situation:
>
> * VM with say 4 GB of RAM, and no swap
> * JVM like ODL starts with Xms 1 GB and Xmx 2 GB, so reserves 1 and plans
> expand to 2, when needed
> * other stuff eats up remaining e.g. 3 GB
> * JVM wants to expand, asks OS for 1 GB, but there is none left - so boum
>
> but AFAIK (I'm not 100% sure) there would still be one of those
> hs_err_*.log files with some details confirming above (like "out of native
> memory", kind of thing).
>
>
>> here's what I saw in a sandbox job [a] that just hit this:
>>
>> Out of memory: Kill process 11546 (java) score 933 or sacrifice child
>> (more debug output is there in the console log)
>>
>> These ODL systems start with 4G and we are setting the max mem for the
>> odl java
>> process to be 2G.
>>
>
> erm, I'm not quite following what is 2 and what is 3 here.. but does my
> description above help you to narrow this down?
>
>
>> I don't think we see this with Carbon, which makes me believe it's *not*
>> some problem from outside
>> of ODL (e.g. not a kernel bug from when we updated the java builder image
>> back on 10/20)
>>
>> I'll keep digging at this. Ideas are welcome for things to look at.
>>
>>
>>
>> [a]
>> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/sandbox/job/netvirt-csit-1n
>> ode-openstack-pike-jamo-upstream-stateful-snat-conntrack-
>> oxygen/7/consoleFull
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > BTW: The most common fix ;) for JVM crashes often is simply upgrading
>> to the latest available patch version of OpenJDK.. but
>> > I'm guessing/hoping we run from RPM and already have the latest - or is
>> this possibly running on an older JVM version package
>> > that was somehow "held back" via special dnf instructions, or manually
>> installed from a ZIP, kind of thing?
>>
>>
>> these systems are built and updated periodically. jdk is installed with
>> "yum install". The specific version
>> in [a] is:
>>
>> 10:57:33 Set Java version
>> 10:57:34 JDK default version...
>> 10:57:34 openjdk version "1.8.0_144"
>> 10:57:34 OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_144-b01)
>> 10:57:34 OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.144-b01, mixed mode)
>>
>
> OK, that seems to be the latest one I also have locally on Fedora 26.
>
> Thanks,
>> JamO
>>
>>
>>
>> >     JamO
>> >
>> >
>> >     >
>> >     > _______________________________________________
>> >     > controller-dev mailing list
>> >     > [email protected] <mailto:
>> [email protected]>
>> >     > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev
>> >     <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev>
>> >     >
>> >     _______________________________________________
>> >     controller-dev mailing list
>> >     [email protected] <mailto:
>> [email protected]>
>> >     https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev
>> >     <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> controller-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev
>
>


-- 
Thanks
Anil
_______________________________________________
controller-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev

Reply via email to