On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 5:03 AM, Sam Hague <sha...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 9:30 PM, Tom Pantelis <tompante...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 9:26 PM, Michael Vorburger <vorbur...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 7:17 PM, Michael Vorburger <vorbur...@redhat.com >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 5:25 PM, Tom Pantelis <tompante...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Michael Vorburger < >>>>> vorbur...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Michael Vorburger < >>>>>> vorbur...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Michael Vorburger < >>>>>>> vorbur...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> almost 3 months ago, on https://lists.opendaylight. >>>>>>>> org/pipermail/controller-dev/2017-September/013889.html, I had >>>>>>>> started a thread re. the mysterious problems hit in the controller >>>>>>>> archetype "self test", which occured on Gerrit and Jenkins, and only >>>>>>>> there >>>>>>>> (it worked locally even 3 months ago). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Today I finally made time to progress on this, and >>>>>>>> https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/CONTROLLER-1799 has the write >>>>>>>> up what is going on there, documented for future reference. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is this feasible to get an odlparent 3.0.2 with >>>>>>>> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/65940/ for >>>>>>>> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/65941/ ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tx, >>>>>>>> M. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> PS: I'm hoping to work on https://jira.opendaylight.org/ >>>>>>>> browse/INFRAUTILS-17 in the coming days, which will likely also >>>>>>>> require a change in odlparent; perhaps this and that could be pooled >>>>>>>> together into a 3.0.2 - anything else? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/66030/ and its related >>>>>>> changes are what I meant here; if all of this, together with >>>>>>> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/65940/, could be released >>>>>>> as an odlparent 3.0.2, in the hopefully not-too-distant future, that >>>>>>> would >>>>>>> be fabulous. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> would any fellow controller commiter be willing to merge this >>>>>> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/65941/ now? >>>>>> >>>>>> Tom, or even I volunteer to, then rebase https://git.opendayligh >>>>>> t.org/gerrit/#/c/66545/ on top of that c/65941 and then I'm happy to >>>>>> merge that one after. >>>>>> >>>>>> It would be good to get both of these archetype things into Oxygen >>>>>> still IMHO. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Agree - I rebased - will merge after >>>>> >>>> >>>> just done, but hit https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/CONTROLLER-1810 >>>> .. following the Big Bump, the Archetype IT is actually broken.. seems to >>>> have something to do with some (shutdown related?) problem in AAA ? Don't >>>> be shy to comment on CONTROLLER-1810 if you have any clue what could be >>>> causing that. >>>> >>> >>>> I'm hoping to merge https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/66545/ >>>> with that @Ignore ASAP anyway, if nobody has any objections; we can then >>>> subsquently remove the @Ignore in the archetype IT, when CONTROLLER-1810 is >>>> sorted. >>>> >>> >>> FYI https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/66545/ is now finally >>> merged, but without IT; in addition to https://jira.opendaylight.o >>> rg/browse/CONTROLLER-1810 there seems to be a second (new?) problem >>> with the IT of the archetype, detailed in https://jira.opendaylight.o >>> rg/browse/CONTROLLER-1811. >>> >>> What are people's views re. ditching the IT and/or CLI (suggested by Sam >>> & Tom) from the archetype? >>> >> >> I think we should keep the startup archetype simple/basic and have an >> advanced archetype that has the extra fluff IT, CLI etc. >> > That's a good idea. This gets the basic users moving forward much easier. > And if they really want something more than can run the advanced version. > That works for me too. Not ditch/remove the IT and/or CLI, but move into an "advanced" archetype. Because the current archetype is well known, let us keep that one as the existing basic one? I wonder if we shold have a new "full" archetype, which would duplicate stuff from the basic (shame.. won't be keep consistent), or we could have something which augments / adds the IT and CLI to an existing basic archetype?
_______________________________________________ controller-dev mailing list controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev
