David Walluck wrote:
> Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
> >
> > "Lord And Master;)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > is there any reason why we can not switch from 2.0.1 to 2.0.2 in the
> > > main beta? (not contrib) there are only minir differences between the 2
> > > but 2.0.2 is needed by the latest licq. I know this has been asked
> > > before. There should not be any ramifications byt changing from 2.0.1 to
> > > 2.0.2 as far I know licq is currently the only program shiping with
> > > cooker/oxygen that uses QT 2.0.. KDE2 ueses 2.1 wich is a whole nother
> > > beast.
> >
> > too late unfortunately, feature freeze is completely freezer.
> >
> > --Chmouel
>
> Consider it a bug fix. Ship with these broken or outdated qt RPMS, and
> have a lot of unhappy licq users at least. If the feature freeze
> excludes fixing bugs, then at least remove licq from the distribution at
> this time, as it does nto work with this version of qt.
>
> --
> Sincerely,
>
> David Walluck
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*nods* I agreee totaly, move it out of there and into contrib, and remove qt
2.01 and put qt2.02 in contrib if it is not possible to update the main distrib
