On Sun, Feb 06, 2000 at 04:26:21PM -0800, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> from the quill of DindinX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > --=-=-=
> > Name : vim Distribution: Mandrake
> > Version : 5.6 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> > Release : 3mdk Build Date: Sun Feb 06
> > 16:17:46 2000
> > --=-=-=
> >
> > * Sun Feb 06 2000 DindinX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 5.6-3mdk
> >
> > - Added support for Chinese/Japanese/Corean support for gvim
> > (Thanks to Pablo)
> > - added a link for the default vimrc.
>
> ctags? Can we puuuuleeeeaaaase have ctags fixed? Maybe it is and was
> just not inluded in the changelog.
>
ctags looks good to me :-/
At least, the ctags program that comes with vim works great with wim.
I've seen that we ship a standalone ctags packages that produce a slightly
different format for tags files.
What should I do?
- Fix the standalone ctags package? But this could break other packages
that depends on it.
- Fix vim so it can read standalone ctags files?
AFAIU the documentation, vim ctags is 'exuberant ctags', so it is normal that
it produce a different tags. Vim should be able to read 3 differents format
of tags, though:
1. {tagname} {TAB} {tagfile} {TAB} {tagaddress}
2. {tagfile}:{tagname} {TAB} {tagfile} {TAB} {tagaddress}
3. {tagname} {TAB} {tagfile} {TAB} {tagaddress} {term} {field} ..
vim's ctags produce the last one and vim is happy with it.
Could you please try and tell me what's wrong/what to do?
Thanks,
DindinX
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]