David Carvalho wrote:

> [...]
>
> omething that mirribleis did on there end to mess
> > > with us i'm sure, witht he fix though all is back to normal. fyi the version 
>included with
> > > air is very outdated and decrepit compared to the latest cvs versions wich have 
>mutli-person
> > > chat etc.
> > >
> > > -DarkWlf
> >
> > ok one more post on this...
> >
> > If someone will accept me to post the new licq rpms as well as the qt2.1 rpms that 
>are needed
> > for the lastest cvs versions..
>
> >
> > if you wish I will once again upload the srpms for the cvs version of licq, and 
>qt2.1beta2
> > (what would you like the version numbering to be for the cvs of licq?? should it 
>be hacklicq?
> > and date? or the coming release version as in hacklicq-0.77-1mdk?
>
> IMHO , Licq is the nicest way to communicate trough the ICQ protocol.
> It's far away the best clone.
> At least 90% of Mandrake customers suffer from this Qt 2.02 (or 2.1, for
> the cvs) + Licq Qt plugin issue. If someone starts this project u
> described above , I'm pretty sure it will increase the popularity of mdk
> distro.
> hacklicq+date would be nice , thus it's constantly in development and
> many important features and bugfixes (like this AOL trick on Licq
> clients) , even *unstable*, are only avaiable in the cvs snapshots.
> And sorry for the terrible english  :)

just let Me know if the srpms will be accepted this time and what the offical 
versioning should be
and i will be happy to post and matain the hacklicq , I would be able to do prolly a 
nightly build
or something to that affect if needed.

-John

Reply via email to