geoffrey lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> licq does not have a problem. :-) i'll explainw hy.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, April 07, 2000 11:43 AM
> > To: Linux-cooker
> > Subject: [Cooker] umm.. we have a problem .. licq 81 in cooker...
> >
> >
> > you have included licq version 81 in cooker but the version of qt you
> > have in cooker is 2.01 this is the wrong version, 81 (non cvs) requires
> > build qt2.1 beta 3 or later. cvs version of licq requires 2.1 beta 4.
>
> no it doesn't. i got 0.81 to build on qt 2.0.1. i didn't even have to add
> any "it won't compile on qt 2.0.x" hacks. however if you use 2.0.1, wordwrap
> will be broken.
>
> > can we PLEASE kill 2.01 rpms from cooker as they are not used by any
> > program (not to mention there is 2.02) and replace them with qt 2.1 or
> > just add them in addtion, the 2.1 rpms in contrib would work well as
> > they are installed in a sepreate dir..
> >
>
> well for now you can snag the src rpm and install qt2.1 and recompile ...of
> cousre the directory of qt 2.1 will ha0ve to be right. just specify it in
> configure.
>
> > -Darkwlf
> >
> >
didn't have to recompile just removed the 2.01 and installed the 2.1 and the
backgrounds came back and the close problem goes away..
acoridn to the licq list yes it dose for it to work corectly.
-DarkWlf
