:~>Nothing is more annoying than to try and intall an rpm and have it fail because of :a dependency issue, only to 1)have =that= rpm fial because of another dependency :issue, or 2) have the dependency be some library buried in an rpm that isn't easily :discernable. The program ezrpm address some of these issues, some other approaches to :package management seem to be able to address these issues. This is addressed by urpmi -- ----------------------------------------------------- Dr. Denis Havlik <http://www.ap.univie.ac.at/users/havlik> Mandrakesoft ||| e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Quality Assurance (@ @) (private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -------------------oOO--(_)--OOo---------------------
- Re: [Cooker] Suugestion for... Steven J Mackenzie
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSS... Stephane Gourichon
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - Ad... Hoyt
- [Cooker] A few urpmi-based improvements Stephane Gourichon
- Re: [Cooker] A few urpmi-based impro... John Grange
- [Cooker] [discuss] Default config su... Hoyt
- Re: [Cooker] [discuss] Default ... Randy Welch
- Re: [Cooker] A few urpmi-based impro... diablero
- Re: [Cooker] A few urpmi-based impro... Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION Denis HAVLIK
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION Ron Stodden
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION Randy Welch
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION Harry Henry Gebel
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION John Grange
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION Anton Graham
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION James Chance
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION Eric MC DECLERCK
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - Kudos Hoyt
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - Ku... Guillaume Cottenceau