On Fri, 26 May 2000, Dan M wrote: > Take a look at what Mac OS X is doing with it's shared libs by using > 'bundles' and 'frameworks'. I think this is a good idea and others might > agree. There is an article about it at: > http://www.arstechnica.com/reviews/2q00/macos-x-dp4/macos-x-dp4-1.html I think bundles would be a great idea, but that goes way beyond the scope of the near future. It is a system design issue and not just an addon. Apple has had a possibility to start from a clean table and they have modelled the entire system around the concept of bundles. Could this even be done in Linux as it is today ? At the very least it would break compatibility with other distros. > I hate to say it, but as our systems get more complex we may need some sort > of single point of configuration information, ala windows registry (or > something better). Well it never hurts to have configuration accessible in a clean way, but this not so much a problem of the files where configuration is stored. Better tools to access the information is where the most good can be done. I like the fact that I can configure the system using a texteditor if need be, but I'd also like to have good tools to do it "the easy and uneducative" :-) way when I don't want to be bothered. Sebastian Vuorinen
Re: [Cooker] Denis: Shared Libs and better security model.
Klaus Erik Sebastian Vuorinen Sat, 27 May 2000 08:08:08 -0700
- [Cooker] Denis: Shared Libs and better secur... Dan M
- Re: [Cooker] Denis: Shared Libs and bet... Denis HAVLIK
- RE: [Cooker] Denis: Shared Libs and bet... Klaus Erik Sebastian Vuorinen
- RE: [Cooker] Denis: Shared Libs and bet... Don Head