On Thu 2003-06-12 at 00:16:54 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Benjamin Pflugmann wrote: > > > >AFAIK, this is need for all platforms. gcc 3.3 has abandoned support > >for multi-line strings, after they were already deprecated since 3.0: > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.3/changes.html > > Is this the same thing I'm seeing with Mesa (hasn't been rebuilding > since gcc 3.3):
I doubt it. From what I have seen, gcc 3.3 gives very specific errors about the multi-line strings (i.e. that "multi-line" mentioned in the error message itself). > http://eijk.homelinux.org/build/cooker/i586/problem/Mesa-5.0.1-3mdk > > gcc -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -march=i586 -mcpu=pentiumpro -g > -march=pentium -DUSE_X86_ASM -DUSE_MMX_ASM -DUSE_3DNOW_ASM -Wall > -Wno-uninitialized -O3 -fexpensive-optimizations -fomit-frame-pointer > -finline-functions -funroll-loops -DNDEBUG -DHW_LOG_ENABLED -DGLX_LOG > -DDYNAMIC_MODULE -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_FCNTL_H=1 -DHAVE_LIMITS_H=1 > -DHAVE_SYS_IOCTL_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 > -DHAVE_SYS_MMAN_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_PERM_H=1 -DHAVE_ASM_SIGCONTEXT_H=1 > -DHAVE_LINUX_NEWAGP=1 -DSIZEOF_LONG=4 -DRETSIGTYPE=void -DHAVE_VPRINTF=1 > -DHAVE_STRDUP=1 -DHAVE_STRERROR=1 -DHAVE_STRSTR=1 -DHAVE_IOPL=1 > -DHAVE_LIBDL=1 -DGLX_LOG -DGLXEXT -DXDEBUG > -DGLX_SO_PATH='"/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/glx-3.so"' -DMESA31 > -DBUILD_COLOR_TABLE_EXT=1 -DGLX_MODULE > -I/home/cooker/RPM/BUILD/Mesa-5.0.1/glx/Mesa-3.2.1/src > -I/home/cooker/RPM/BUILD/Mesa-5.0.1/glx/Mesa-3.2.1/include > -I/home/cooker/RPM/BUILD/Mesa-5.0.1/glx/Mesa-3.2.1/src/X > -I/home/cooker/RPM/BUILD/Mesa-5.0.1/glx/Mesa-3.2.1/src/X86 -fPIC -c 3dnow.c > 3dnow.c:159:35: pasting "gl_3dnow_rescale_normals_raw" and "(" does not > give a valid preprocessing token > 3dnow.c:159:35: pasting "gl_3dnow_normalize_normals_raw" and "(" does not > give a valid preprocessing token After "quick" look, the problems seems to be here (3dnow.c:26ff): extern void gl_##pfx##_rescale_normals_##masked## (NORM_ARGS); \ extern void gl_##pfx##_normalize_normals_##masked## (NORM_ARGS); \ ... IMHO, the last concatination (##) makes no sense. The concatination is used to create a new label, but the label ended with 'masked'. If I am not mistaken, simply removing the last '##' on every of these line should do the trick. But then, beware, my preprocessor-fu is not worth of mentioning (I never have used this concatination myself). Bye,
