Thomas Backlund wrote:
> The reason my _updated_ update kernel kept the version
> was to keep it "name compatible" with the original update kernel
> so that 3rd party modules and RPMS wont complain ( nVidia, Ati, ...)

Ah! That's a good reason.
I agree with Danny that "hackkernel" is a bad, bad name! The kernels that you guys provide are as solid as they get :-)


Thanks for your hard work,

Narfi.




Reply via email to