Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 2003-07-18 at 14:49, Michael Scherer wrote: > > On Friday 18 July 2003 15:08, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Fri, 2003-07-18 at 13:37, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote: > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > > > urpmi kdemultimedia > > > > Some package requested cannot be installed: > > > > kdemultimedia-3.1.2-8mdk.i586 (due to missing > > > > kdemultimedia-devel-3.1.2-8mdk.i586) > > > > kdemultimedia-devel-3.1.2-8mdk.i586 (due to unsatisfied > > > > devel(libnoatunarts)) (J/n) j > > > > alt er allerede installert > > > > (nb for everythings already installed) > > > > > > > > this makes no sense, it's not a question, yet you have to answer > > > > yes or no, also laurent has to fix these b0rked dependencies > > > > > > Look's like a string's gone missing somewhere - IIRC, it should say > > > "Is this OK? (Y/n)" (or the local equivalent). > > > > The problem is that no doesn't install anything and stop and yes doesn't > > install anything, and stop. > > So, since there is nothing more to be installed, only a message should > > be displayed. > > I think it would be quite hard to code for this instance - where the > only packages to be installed, cannot be installed. I also doubt it'd be > a priority for fpons, since it's not a situation that should occur in a > stable release.
I have to admit the error message is not very well... Howerver, FYI you may use --allow-nodeps or --allow-force to disable backtrack on broken dependencies, but it may not be what you want. François.
