Ron Stodden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am in agreement with you. The problem I see is that Mandrakesoft > uses a unique development process, which may well turn out to have > higher merit than the classic one, but names the user-involvement > testing phase of that process using the traditional and well-defined > name "beta test" when their process patently does not conform even > remotely to that definition. Sorry Ron, our development process is a OpenSource development in the Bazaar style where everything is published the soon as we code it. -- MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.mandrakesoft.com In travel. --Chmouel
- RE: [Cooker] Mandrake's Stability Riyad Kalla
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake's Stability Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake's Stability Civileme
- RE: [Cooker] Mandrake's Stability Riyad Kalla
- RE: [Cooker] Mandrake's Stability Civileme
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake's Stability Brook humphrey
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake's Stability Civileme
- RE: [Cooker] Mandrake's Stability Riyad Kalla
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake's Stability Ron Stodden
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake's Stability Ron Stodden
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake's Stability Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake's Stability Ron Stodden
- RE: [Cooker] Mandrake's Stability Geoffrey Lee
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake's Stabili... Ron Stodden
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake's Sta... Burkhard Zombronner
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake's Stability yoann
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake's Stability Brook humphrey
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake's Stability David Talbot
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake's Stability Graham Percival
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake's Stability Guy T. Rice