On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 10:07:40AM -0400, [oliv.blin] wrote: > http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3575 > > > > > > ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-27-07 16:07 ------- > This bug is a duplicate of #2105 . >
If the date is intended to be a ISO date, it is wrongly formatted. I have not seen dates written like this before. best regards keld
