On Tuesday July 29 2003 07:45 am, Jan Ciger wrote: > | Do you mean 2.3.2-8mdk also failed for you, really? > > No, -8 was (is) OK. I thought that I had the latest version, when > I posted the original mail that it worked for me, but I didn't > notice that you uploaded a -9 in the meantime. -9 is the broken > version, not -8. > > Regards, > > Jan
I've got glibc-2.3.2-9mdk glibc-devel-2.3.2-9mdk and no
problems with the system. AMD 1.54g (oc'd), ReiserFS
--
Tom Brinkman Corpus Christi, Texas
