On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 09:06:45 +0200
Svetoslav Slavtchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> the bad boy is xcdroast, not cdrecord.
> i have the impression that when the cdrecord version changes
> xcdroast starts to segfaults, could it be that the cdrecord version is
> hardcoded somewhere in xcdroast?


Actually the bad boy is neither of those pkgs.

It is Warly's cdrecord cdrtools-dvd.patch which causes xcdroast to
segfault.

If cdrecord is built without this patch then xcdroast does not segfault.
I have done so and tested it operation.
Not having a dvd recorder the patch is of no use to me.

On another note the current mdk is cdrecord-2.01-0.a16.1mdk whereas the
current Alpha release of cdrtools is 2.01a18.

With the 2.01a18 release even when the dvd.patch is included xcdroast
does not segfault though it is necessary to launch xcdroast with -n flag
since it miss-reads the cdrecord version.


    Charles

-- 
You can't push a horse on a lunge line
                -- Murphy's Horse Laws n°11
-------------------------
Mandrake Linux 9.2 on PurpleDragon
Kernel- 2.4.22-0.2mdkenterprise http://www.eslrahc.com
-------------------------

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to