On Friday 15 August 2003 02:58, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote: > On Friday 15 August 2003 02:45, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > > Ainsi parlait Guillaume Cottenceau : > > > - fix DIRM: file ShellQuote.pm > > > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.1/String/ > > > > Not sure it is really a good idea however: they are many perl > > String::Foo subpackages, even if not already packaged, are they all > > going to own the String directory ? Unfortunaltly, there is no > > top-level String module :-( > > hm, it does'nt do any harm, and if they all own the String directory, > it will only be rm'ed when the last package owning it is removed.. > > IMHO it's a good idea in such cases..
so, why do not we say that a package own alls directory ? A package using /usr/bin would own /usr and /usr/bin. This way, /usr/bin will be removed when there is nothing left. And the same goes for all packages. -- Mickaël Scherer
