>>>>> "gc" == Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
gc> Andrey Borzenkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > Now we need to consider this as it should, e.g. with vanilla >> > kernel anyway many mandrake additions are missing, but it's still >> > important and probably should be at least documented. >> >> put it another way - do we need this patch for 2.6? If yes, please, could you >> add it to contrib 2.6 RPM? gc> I'd say yes but I guess Gwenole and/or Juan should rather answer gc> that one. without looking at the glibc source, we need it :( Later, Juan. -- In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they are different -- Larry McVoy
