Hi!

I just tried to install (not upgrade) subversion and got the following
error:

  $ sudo -H /usr/sbin/urpmi subversion-client-local
  Some package requested cannot be installed:
  libsubversion0-0.25-3mdk.i586 (due to unsatisfied devel(libsvn_diff-1))
  subversion-client-local-0.25-3mdk.i586 (due to missing 
libsubversion0-0.25-3mdk.i586) (Y/n) n
  
When I look for it, there are several packages requiring
devel(libsvn_diff-1), but none providing it:

  $ urpmf --requires 'libsvn_diff-1'
  subversion-client-common:libsvn_diff-1.so.0
  subversion-client-common:devel(libsvn_diff-1)
  libsubversion0:libsvn_diff-1.so.0
  libsubversion0:devel(libsvn_diff-1)
  subversion-repos:libsvn_diff-1.so.0

  $ urpmf --provides 'libsvn_diff-1'
  libsubversion0:libsvn_diff-1.so.0

(Btw, if I call urpmf with 'devel(libsvn_diff-1)' it gives no results
at all. Any idea how the argument has be written to work correctly?)

I had no problem to do a system upgrade (urpmi --auto-select) just
beforehand[1], so I am quite sure that I am not affected by the mirror
problems mentioned earlier. Anyhow, the subversion packages on my
local mirror are:

  $ cooker-contrib$ ls -l *subversion* *svn*
  -rw-r--r--  1 b b  571344 Aug 12 15:45 apache2-mod_dav_svn-2.0.47_0.25-3mdk.i586.rpm
  -rw-r--r--  1 b b  250956 Aug 12 15:45 libsubversion0-0.25-3mdk.i586.rpm
  -rw-r--r--  1 b b  143854 Aug 12 15:45 libsubversion0-devel-0.25-3mdk.i586.rpm
  -rw-r--r--  1 b b  456891 Aug 12 15:45 libsubversion0-static-devel-0.25-3mdk.i586.rpm
  -rw-r--r--  1 b b   95965 Aug 12 15:45 subversion-client-common-0.25-3mdk.i586.rpm
  -rw-r--r--  1 b b   35877 Aug 12 15:45 subversion-client-dav-0.25-3mdk.i586.rpm
  -rw-r--r--  1 b b   13365 Aug 12 15:45 subversion-client-local-0.25-3mdk.i586.rpm
  -rw-r--r--  1 b b  184925 Aug 12 15:45 subversion-python-0.25-3mdk.i586.rpm
  -rw-r--r--  1 b b   88872 Aug 12 15:45 subversion-repos-0.25-3mdk.i586.rpm
  -rw-r--r--  1 b b  175454 Aug 12 15:45 subversion-tools-0.25-3mdk.i586.rpm

Any ideas?

Bye,

        Benjamin.


[1] Except, of course, for the file conflict with groff already
    reported on the list.

Reply via email to