http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4576
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 16:05 ------- Fixed in evolution-1.4.4-5mdk -- Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ------- Reminder: ------- assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] status: RESOLVED creation_date: description: Evolution seems to transform the charset of some of the messages I fetch from my IMAP mailbox. It is hard to describe, thus I am going to show the differences between what's stored on the server and what ends up in my evolution display. The example concerns specifically one mail ; I list all headers and just the first paragraph of the body. You'll see that : 1. The original "content-type" header is replaced by another one which appears at the bottom of the headers 2. The mail body is wrongly translated in utf-8 characters (French accents) whereas the "content-type" header still indicates iso-8859-1. The "quoted-printable" encoding makes this quite clear (French accents are one byte in iso-8859-1, and two in utf-8) The net effect is that some of my e-mails become unreadable (broken French accents). ******************** Here is the mail as stored on the IMAP server (I have an ssh access to it) : >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 7 20:49:55 2003 Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from postfix3-1.free.fr (postfix3-1.free.fr [213.228.0.44]) by miel.brainstorm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C6B1C89F0; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 20:49:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from h2h7n3 (pauguste-3-81-57-114-42.fbx.proxad.net [81.57.114.42]) by postfix3-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E413C240; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 20:49:54 +0200 (CEST) From: "Pierre Mounier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Antoine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 20:48:47 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Spip] Changer caract9ristiques des champs de saisie "articles" Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.12a) Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: Quoted-printable Content-description: Mail message body X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES autolearn=ham version=2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 28874 Pour ce coup-ci, je ne sais pas, mais je sais (par exp=E9rience) que dans nombre de cas, c'est vraiment g=EAnant. Cela para=EEt idiot, mais il est tr=E8s difficile de faire passer =E0 une communaut=E9 de r=E9dacteurs = la gymnastique qui consiste =E0 dire "pour les infos pratiques, c'est P.S." ou "pour la biblio, c'est PGP", etc. [snip] ******************** Here is the e-mail as displayed by Evolution when I choose "display source" : Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from postfix3-1.free.fr (postfix3-1.free.fr [213.228.0.44]) by miel.brainstorm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C6B1C89F0; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 20:49:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from h2h7n3 (pauguste-3-81-57-114-42.fbx.proxad.net [81.57.114.42]) by postfix3-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E413C240; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 20:49:54 +0200 (CEST) From: "Pierre Mounier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Antoine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 20:48:47 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Spip] Changer caract?9ristiques des champs de saisie "articles" Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.12a) Content-transfer-encoding: Quoted-printable Content-description: Mail message body X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES autolearn=ham version=2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=ISO-8859-1 X-Evolution-Source: imap://[EMAIL PROTECTED]:1143/ Pour ce coup-ci, je ne sais pas, mais je sais (par exp=C3=A9rience) que=20 dans nombre de cas, c'est vraiment g=C3=AAnant. Cela para=C3=AEt idiot, mai= s il=20 est tr=C3=A8s difficile de faire passer =C3=A0 une communaut=C3=A9 de r=C3= =A9dacteurs la=20 gymnastique qui consiste =C3=A0 dire "pour les infos pratiques, c'est=20 P.S." ou "pour la biblio, c'est PGP", etc. [snip]