http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5489


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEEDINFO
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1




------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-14-09 22:18 -------
I have got a fix from the SANE team now and made new RPMs containing the fix.
These will appear on the Cooker only after the QA has checked them as we are in
deep-freeze. For you to test immediately, I have put up the new packages here

http://www.linuxprinting.org/till/tmp/sane-backends-1.0.12-3mdk.i586.rpm
http://www.linuxprinting.org/till/tmp/saned-1.0.12-3mdk.i586.rpm
http://www.linuxprinting.org/till/tmp/libsane1-1.0.12-3mdk.i586.rpm
http://www.linuxprinting.org/till/tmp/libsane1-devel-1.0.12-3mdk.i586.rpm
http://www.linuxprinting.org/till/tmp/sane-1.0.12-3mdk.src.rpm

Please download the packages (with the "wget" command or when you use your
browser by right-clicking on the links and choosing "Save Link Target As ...".

Install the packages with

rpm -Fvh *sane*.i586.rpm

and test whether your scanner works better now. I do not have a Canon scanner
and my Epson Perfection 1260, 2450, and HP PSC 950 work without problems with
thse packages (but also with the old packages).

Please report as soon as possible whether the new packages make your scanner work.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


------- Reminder: -------
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: NEEDINFO
creation_date: 
description: 
With sane 1.0.12 the CanoScan LiDE driver is broken.  It will never go beyond
reporting an 'I/O' error for the scanner.  After down-grading to the 1.0.11
packages from mdk 9.1 everything worked fine (I had to rpm --nodeps in order to
get it to install since 1.0.11 depends on libexif.so.8 and 9.2 has libexif.so.9)

also - this address has a little info from a suse mailing list about the driver
problem in 1.0.12
http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-linux-e/2003-Jun/3022.html
mark

Reply via email to