[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
> > Le Samedi 18 Octobre 2003 11:43, Buchan Milne a écrit :
> >> No significant advantage over CUPS (AFAIR).
> >
> > So would you prefer cups for a printer not shared (for both security and
> > size reasons) ?
>
> I have no such printers ;-).
unlike many people (such as standalone desktops) ;-)
> Till probably has some other reasons ...
I wonder which ones.
I found this script:
/etc/dynamic/scripts/functions.script
check_activated $0
MODE=660
OWNER=lp.sys
if [ -x /usr/sbin/update-alternatives ]; then
TYPE=`/usr/sbin/update-alternatives --display lpr 2> /dev/null | grep
currently | cut -f 6 -d ' '`
case "$TYPE" in
*lpd) MODE=660; OWNER=lp.lp;;
*cups) MODE=660; OWNER=lp.sys;;
*pdq) MODE=666;; # should be done via pam_console
esac
fi
...
Is pdq less secure than others for this ?
