could someone from kernel team have a look at this?
L. ----- Forwarded message from Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: grsec/cleanup message on console
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "from Luca Berra at Oct
22, 2003 08:57:04 am"
To: Luca Berra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 09:19:43 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: Postfix-users mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Time-Zone: USA EST, 6 hours behind central European time
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wietse Venema)
X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira MailArmor (version: 2.0.1.7; VAE: 6.22.0.1; VDF: 6.22.0.12; host: english-breakfast.cloud9.net)
Precedence: bulk
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=-10.0 required=4.9
tests=sender_whitelisted
X-Spam-Level:
Luca Berra:
in gr_log_resource() we have
if (unlikely(wanted >= task->rlim[res].rlim_cur && task->rlim[res].rlim_cur != RLIM_INFINITY)) security_alert(GR_RESOURCE_MSG, ........
using >= is IMHO wrong.
Indeed. I recommend that this grsec bug is fixed, instead of changing Postfix in order to work around grsec bugs.
Wietse
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Luca Berra -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Communication Media & Services S.r.l.
/"\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
X AGAINST HTML MAIL
/ \