Luca Olivetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > François Pons wrote: > > Again, it is domage you didn't issue an --bug of urpmi, it is always nice when > > something seems to be bad. > > Since I have another machine to upgrade I will use the option. > I suppose urpmi will work normally and just save a log of what it did am I right? > Should I use it for every invocation or just for the final "urpmi --auto-select" > that tells me that everything is installed? > (also, murphy's law (or heisenberg principle) dictates that when I'll use the > --bug option there will be no problem to report ;-)
In fact, when you see something bad in the resolution, you cancel the selection and try again. By default, urpmi stop on error (provided you disable transaction split). François.
