On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, Geoffrey Lee wrote: > i think that, i wold be more interested in a "open-source" distribution or > better still, a "free" distro where "free" is the "free" as defined by the > Free Software Foundation. that would mean no Qt libs, or pine ... No pine? Great I guess I can't write e-mail then:( You know the reason I am not using DFebian is exactly that reason. What about freedom as in freedom of choice. I hope Mandrake will always allow users to pick the mailer that best suits them, instead of trying to push some religion on them. I just want to write e-mail. Save the religious debates for some other day. Some people may not think that GPL-free is more free than BSD-free of QT-free, or <insert your license here>-free. If I wanted a GPL-only distribution I would be using Debian. And If I wanted a religion I would look elsewhere than a Linux distribution or the top of a cereal box.
- [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake distro (... Guillaume Cottenceau
- RE: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake... Geoffrey Lee
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mand... Guillaume Cottenceau
- RE: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-... Geoffrey Lee
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Li... David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Li... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake... Armisis Aieoln
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mand... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake... john . cavan
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mand... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-... Pablo Saratxaga
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-... David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Li... Graham Percival
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mand... Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-... john . cavan