> > Might seem like a silly question.... but... Why does the hackkernel RPM > automatically install an SMP kernel. I would think that a single > processor RPM > would be convenient and more practical. I'm in the process of > compiling the > source anyways, but for people that don't want to do that the > nonSMP RPM would > be nice. > well normally when you install a smp kernel on a non-smp machine it still works, but of courswe it's better if you compile it optimized for for SMP|NOSMP. having that said, the next release of linux-mandrake is definitely going to be mainly kernel 2.2 based as kernel 2.4 hs not even reached "production" state ..
- Re: [Cooker] Stefan Siegel
- [Cooker] Sesame > Kerberos Franck Martin
- [Cooker] 10 Desktop features request LINK WORLD
- Re: [Cooker] 10 Desktop features request -... Hoyt
- Re: [Cooker] 10 Desktop features request -... Hoyt
- Re: [Cooker] 10 Desktop features reque... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] 10 Desktop features request Hoyt
- Re: [Cooker] 10 Desktop features request Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] 10 Desktop features request Guillaume Cottenceau
- [Cooker] Tim McKenzie
- Re: [Cooker] Geoffrey Lee
- Re: [Cooker] Ellick Chan
- Re: [Cooker] Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] Michael Irving
- [Cooker] T Korte
- [Cooker] Andel, Jiri (CAP, GCF)
- Re: [Cooker] Geoffrey Lee
- Re: [Cooker] Andreas Simon
- [Cooker] Rebecca Jane Williams
- [Cooker] Jesper Holmberg
- [Cooker] fl