> Excuse me, but am I reading this correctly? Take a look at the .spec
> file of xpp:
>
> CFLAGS="${CFLAGS:--O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti
> -pipe -s -mCXXFLAGS="${CXXFLAGS:--O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
> -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -pipe -FFLAGS="${FFLAGS:--O3
> -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -pipe -s -m[ -f
> configure.in ] && libtoolize --copy --force ;
> ./configure i586-mandrake-linux \
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> --prefix=/usr \
> --exec-prefix=/usr \
> --bindir=/usr/bin \
> --sbindir=/usr/sbin \
> --sysconfdir=/etc \
> --datadir=/usr/share \
> --includedir=/usr/include \
> --libdir=/usr/lib \
> --libexecdir=/usr/lib \
> --localstatedir=/var/state \
> --sharedstatedir=/usr/com \
> --mandir=/usr/share/man \
> %make
>
Are you talking about %configure expanded, or are you talking about this
bloat in the spec? you have to be kidding me ...
> Can this perhaps be done in a way that will allow it to build on non
> ix86 machines?
>
if you have alpha / ppc whqtever rpm should give you the correct one with
%configure or if you use ./configure then the configure sh script should pick
that up too ..
--
Geoff
