Yo!
[...]
>
> > > This is (at the moment) totally wrong! libxml2 is an own package,
> > > the only problem so far is that you can't install both devel
> > > packages of libxml and libxml2. One package needed to have libxml
> >=20
> > Yes but there are some incompat problemw ith libxml and libxml2, (AFAIK) =
> and besidew
> > when libxml2 was first released daniel of w3.org put it in a package call=
> ed
> > libxml2 ...
>
> Thats what I wrote a few lines below :-/ The problem was here
> that there is a wrong Requires: libxml =3D 2.2.2 in the config instead
> of libxml2. We should continue the libxml2 versus libxml problems
> in my other new thread.
ok I get it now ..probably Yoann did a hardcode of
Requires: libxml = %{version} instead of %{name} = %{version} which definitely
work better for most cases, though I can't be sure, I have go to check
the specfile to confirm that I am right.
--
Geoff
