"Steven R. Hatfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> How "runable" is cooker as an every day machine? I really like the extras
> that 7.2beta has (*cough* KDE2!!! *cough*), and would like to use them, but
> don't know how stable/unstable it is. I know that the top locale problem has
> been fixed in cooker, that's why I would want to use cooker instead of the
> 7.2 beta.

the first beta (e.g. the iso) was stable enough if you consider the core
of the OS.

for the rest, many things were broken, they are currently being fixed.

it's pretty hard to tell you "how stable" can it be..



-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Reply via email to