Vadim Plessky écrivit :
> Sunday 10 December 2000 23:27, Geoffrey Lee ???????:
> | > By the way, does it make sense to have documentation & header files
> | > specified as "i586"?
> | > IMHO, it should .noarch.
> |
> | Yes you are rgiht but IMHO you can't do that since if you do noarch the
> | whole package will be noarch, which is wrong!
> |
>
> There is no big problem at a moment, but I hope we will have Alpha and
> PowerPC ports some time later.
> It will be really stupid to have QT2-doc-xxx.i586.rpm, QT2-doc-xxx.alpha.rpm
> and QT2-doc-xxx.powerpc.rpm, as they are exactly the same docs.
> (same is valid for for -devel rpms)
[...]
qt2-doc no longer exist. Documentation have been merged in both future
libqt2 and libqt2-devel packages (which are not yet uploaded).
--
MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com
PARIS, FRANCE --David
