Blue Lizard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I (at a later date when it is thoroughly more developed) were to
> get you the white papers concerning the api standardization and
> changes/upgrades/fixes in gcc 3 would you consider making a
> kernel-gcc-etc.rpm for testing purposes? I care not to compile my own
> kernels.:)
i can make one and put it on my homepage, but well just for testing
there is no way at this stage of gcc3 to make the default kernel
compiler.
> Hold on though, by 'trigger', do you mean to identify/track down?
> Interesting, I wonder why it would be more so than another compiler of
> the same family.
