Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Yura Gusev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > New links is out.
> 
> just build it. it seems option ``no_proxy_for'' is not good anymore. Am i the
> only one who had to remove it to make it work nicely?

have you noticed the changelog :

> * Noproxy removed because it is broken

Reply via email to