I have to agree.  While putting all of the reusable routines in a 
library is nice, it seems with a lot of packages that we're creating
library packages for their own sake.  This is making things almost
as messy as Windows as far as figuring out what's missing and why
something doesn't work. 

Just my $0.02 worth.

V.

Andrej Borsenkow wrote:
> 
> >
> > To put it more simply, if you cannot install A without B nor B without A
> > and they both come from the same source, they can just as well be in the
> > same RPM.
> >
> 
> Thinking ... umm ... you are right. Really :-)
> 
> -andrej


Reply via email to