I have to agree. While putting all of the reusable routines in a library is nice, it seems with a lot of packages that we're creating library packages for their own sake. This is making things almost as messy as Windows as far as figuring out what's missing and why something doesn't work. Just my $0.02 worth. V. Andrej Borsenkow wrote: > > > > > To put it more simply, if you cannot install A without B nor B without A > > and they both come from the same source, they can just as well be in the > > same RPM. > > > > Thinking ... umm ... you are right. Really :-) > > -andrej
- [Cooker] Dependancy LOOP: eel, libeel0 and nautilus-mo... Stefan van der Eijk
- Re: [Cooker] Dependancy LOOP: eel, libeel0 and na... Arnd Bergmann
- RE: [Cooker] Dependancy LOOP: eel, libeel0 an... Andrej Borsenkow
- RE: [Cooker] Dependancy LOOP: eel, libeel... Arnd Bergmann
- RE: [Cooker] Dependancy LOOP: eel, li... Andrej Borsenkow
- Re: [Cooker] Dependancy LOOP: ee... Vincent Meyer
- Re: [Cooker] Dependancy LOOP: eel, li... Warly
- Re: [Cooker] Dependancy LOOP: ee... R.I.P. Deaddog
- Re: [Cooker] Dependancy LOOP... Arnd Bergmann
- Re: [Cooker] Dependancy LOOP: eel, libeel0 an... Alexander Werth