Re: [Cooker] Why gcc 2.96 and not 3.0?

[Guillaume Cottenceau]

"J . A . Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


[...]

> I also would love gcc-3.0 as the standard compiler. I use C++ and it is the best
> C++ compiler in gcc history. And support for the new ISO C99 is marvelous, also.

You can already it... as long as it's in the contrib... you can.

> People progamming in C should know how much of C++ features are 'backported' to
> C99.

I would be interested to know more on that backport stuff you're talking
about. Do you have a link?

 

-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/