Alexander Skwar wrote: > In how far can a symlink be "critical"? And why is RPMS.cooker -> > RPMS non-critical? > > I don't understand... > > Alexander Skwar > I believe that he is saying because there's an actual directory there as well. RPMS->real directory RPMS.cooker->symlink Even ncftp and lftp can't follow symlinks properly, so I would not be surprised at all if Windows programs weren't even aware of them. -- Sincerely, David Walluck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Re: [Cooker] cooker/Mandrake/RPMS2 = contrib/RPMS ?? Ron Stodden
- Re: [Cooker] cooker/Mandrake/RPMS2 = contrib/RPMS ?? Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] cooker/Mandrake/RPMS2 = contrib/RPMS ?? Warly
- Re: [Cooker] cooker/Mandrake/RPMS2 = contrib/RPMS ?? Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] cooker/Mandrake/RPMS2 = contrib/RPMS ?? Salane King
- Re: [Cooker] cooker/Mandrake/RPMS2 = contrib/RPMS ?? Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] cooker/Mandrake/RPMS2 = contrib/RPMS... Ron Stodden
- Re: [Cooker] cooker/Mandrake/RPMS2 = contrib/... Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] cooker/Mandrake/RPMS2 = cont... Ron Stodden
- Re: [Cooker] cooker/Mandrake/RPMS2 =... Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] cooker/Mandrake/RPM... David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] cooker/Mandrake/RPMS2 = contrib/... Peter Ruskin
- Re: [Cooker] cooker/Mandrake/RPMS2 = cont... Ron Stodden