Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The only issue I see, is that with autofs the mountpoints are not > visible. That is, you go to /auto (or wherever) and do a ls, and you i don't really know either, but here is what i think: With autofs, you can put a very low unmounting timeout. But in that case you loose the buffer, everytime you access a file, it must read again as it was unmounted.
- [Cooker] supermount vs autofs Frederik Himpe
- Re: [Cooker] supermount vs autofs Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] supermount vs autofs Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] supermount vs autofs Joal Heagney
- Re: [Cooker] supermount vs autofs Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] supermount vs autofs David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] supermount vs autofs Borsenkow Andrej
- Re: [Cooker] supermount vs autofs Frederik Himpe