Le Lundi 22 Octobre 2001 04:04, Blue Lizard scribit : > Chris Edwards wrote: > >>well, cooker used KDE 2 alpha 1 when it came out. > >>why not use KDE3? Get the KDE3 bugs worked out along with the > >>development of > >>KDE3.
because it use qt3 and qt3 break binary compatibility. So most of the Qt apps will be break. > > I'm guessing that the development period of kde3 is much longer than that > > of Mandrake 8.2. I'm sure they want a stable kde in the final release of > > 8.2, so they are probably waiting until 8.2 is released before they put > > kde3 in cooker... i may be wrong, but that's my guess. > > > > -Chris > > yes. think about the stability that is meant to be associated with the > x.2 release. Mdk tends to do a good job following this scheme with only > a few big flukes (devfs call had to be made and i am not as sure as > others that it was wrong, esp with its easy dont-use-it-ability) indeed. Now they should also improve for the others. -- Copyleft Faber's prod. 2001 http://perso.wanadoo.fr/linux_wizard/index.html
