Am Sonntag, 11. November 2001, 17:09:24 Uhr MET, schrieb Han: > Goetz Waschk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Am Sonntag, 11. November 2001, 14:32:59 Uhr MET, schrieb Han: > >> Because mpg321 is not yet in main, we are testing it out. > > > I did some testing, mpg321 seems to be much slower than mpg123 > > (factor 4), on my Celeron/333 Mhz. > Madplay: compiled for i586 > PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND > 16446 han 14 0 1304 1304 1128 S 15.9 0.6 0:03 madplay > > mpg321: compiled for i586 > PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND > 18540 han 15 0 1232 1232 1000 R 15.6 0.6 0:02 mpg321 > > madplay: compiled for i686 > PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND > 25948 han 19 0 1068 1068 900 R 5.7 0.5 0:00 madplay > > mpg123: compiled for i586 > PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND > 26565 han 17 0 1084 1084 868 S 3.7 0.5 0:00 mpg123 > > mpg123: compiled for i686 > PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND > 26244 han 16 0 1228 1228 1008 S 3.7 0.6 0:00 mpg123 Hi, I did some different tests, they say more about the speed of the players. All packages compiled for i686.
[goetz@abgrund moplayaz]$ time mpg123 -q -s mvp002a_decem_-_heartache.mp3 > /dev/null Junk at the beginning 49443303 18.75user 0.06system 0:19.17elapsed 98%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (2528major+51minor)pagefaults 0swaps [goetz@abgrund moplayaz]$ time mpg321 -q -s mvp002a_decem_-_heartache.mp3 > /dev/null 87.82user 0.08system 1:30.32elapsed 97%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (2622major+95minor)pagefaults 0swaps CU -- Götz Waschk <> student of computer science <> university Rostock http://www.informatik.uni-rostock.de/~waschk/waschk.asc for PGP key --> Logout Fascism! <--
