Fabrice FACORAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > We have gcc-2.96 and gcc-3.02 working very well together using > > update-alternative, a gcc-2.95.3 would also be great ;-)
too much compiler we don't support gcc-2.95.3..
Fabrice FACORAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > We have gcc-2.96 and gcc-3.02 working very well together using > > update-alternative, a gcc-2.95.3 would also be great ;-)
too much compiler we don't support gcc-2.95.3..