Would this help my machine control application that seems to be quite slugish in paying attention to various things going on in X?
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Badran Sent: December 12, 2001 8:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Cooker] Preemtible Kernel -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Are we likely to have the pre-emtibilty patch applied to the non enterprise/secure kernels? This would boost apparent performence on most desktop systems, and if not applied to the enterprise/secure kernels server administrators would not be affected. Personally it is something i would really like added, especially as i have become to lazy to compile my own kernel. Thanks Tom - -- Tom "Tomahawk" Badran Department of Computing, Imperial College - ----------------------------------------------- PGP Key available from certserver.pgp.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8GAUpXCpWOla2mCcRAhbKAJ9t+KEnhAr6IaHgLypm9PqioG/N9ACeN7wj 14S/Kz+4GnAAWLKUwGNmbMM= =jFSF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.307 / Virus Database: 168 - Release Date: 12/11/01 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.307 / Virus Database: 168 - Release Date: 12/11/01
