[sorry if it is duplicated but I never got it today so I assume it is lost]
> > > > > Well "absolutely" is a bit too strong IMO. If 99% of people use a > > graphical logging manager (and that's what our users do), I would > > even then think that there is a real reason: in written language, > > you need a space between a name and a number, even if the number > > reflects the revision/version number of what name refers to. > > > > I doubt that users will ever see it. When it is released it is called KDE - > or am I wrong? So it just for convenience of poor cooker testers :-) But > well, do it your way, it is just one file to edit, I can live with it. > > > > > > Right so we could say that it's the "for" loop in shell which > > forgets spaces in names. What I wanted to say is that if "startx" > > designers would have thought/wanted of really supported a target > > name with space in the name, it could be written otherwise > > (granted xinit would also support it). > > > > Are you absolutely sure that all other places where session name is used are > "space safe"? Who is going to audit them? Startx was just the first obvious > example. > > -andrej
