Paolo Pedroni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Then there is a problem in libgtk+extra-devel, which provides > libgtk+extra-devel, and not libgtkextra-devel. > > Or the problem might just be in geda-gschem, which explicitly requires > libgtk+extra.
In the RPM system, each package provides: - (automatically) all the libraries contained in the filelist - (automatically) the package name with a versioning equals to %version-%release - all the explicit Provides: tag you may want to add in your specfile These two packages are perfectly regular to my eyes. [gc@bi ~] rpm -qp --provides /contrib/RPMS/libgtk+extra0-0.99.17-2mdk.i586.rpm libgtkextra-0.99.so.17 libgtk+extra0 = 0.99.17-2mdk [gc@bi ~] grep ^Provides: SPECS/gtk+extra.spec Provides: libgtk+extra-devel [gc@bi ~] rpm -qp --provides /contrib/RPMS/libgtk+extra0-devel-0.99.17-2mdk.i586.rpm libgtk+extra-devel libgtk+extra0-devel = 0.99.17-2mdk -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
