I applied the patches you mentioned below . One of the two patches from netraverse fails in two files (don't remember which patch failed and which files were affected). After analyzing the <filename>.c.rej-files, I made the supposed changes by hand. They should have added a include-statement (like the one in kernel/sched.c below).
I could send a patched version of the netraverse-patches that apply cleanly to kernel-source-2.4.18-6mdk if you like. Regrard, Uwe trax wrote: > Just curious what patches you applied. > I tried patching the source of the 2.4.18-6mdk > with > > Kernel-Win4Lin3-2.4.18.patch > mki-adapter.patch > kernel-fix-mki.patch > > I see it also fails with kernel/sched.c.*************** > *** 32,37 **** > > #include <asm/uaccess.h> > #include <asm/mmu_context.h> > > extern void timer_bh(void); > extern void tqueue_bh(void); > --- 32,40 ---- > > #include <asm/uaccess.h> > #include <asm/mmu_context.h> > + #ifdef CONFIG_MKI > + #include <asm/mki.h> > + #endif > > extern void timer_bh(void); > extern void tqueue_bh(void); > ########################################### > > Trying to create a bzImage, produces the following ... > > sched.c: In function `schedule': > sched.c:668: warning: implicit declaration of function `CALL_MKI_HOOK' > sched.c:668: `MKI_HOOK_SWITCH_AWAY' undeclared (first use in this > function) > sched.c:668: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > sched.c:668: for each function it appears in.) > make[2]: *** [sched.o] Error 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.18-6mdk-win4lin/kernel' > make[1]: *** [first_rule] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.18-6mdk-win4lin/kernel' > make: *** [_dir_kernel] Error 2 > > > So did you add, or change anything else to get this to compile? > (no rush, I am running it on and old 2.4.16 kernel, but it would be nice > to use the supermount and other goodies that are in 8.2) > > > > On Mon, 2002-03-18 at 22:34, Uwe Reimann wrote: > >>Hi Robert, hi list, >> >>I have a patch ready that makes the patches for win4lin compile and >> > run > >>under kernel-2.4.18-6mdk. I am not a kernel-hacker, therefore I don't >>know wether everything's done right, but, at least for me, it works. >> >>Apply the patch after applying the patches from netraverse. >> >>Regards, Uwe >> >>P.S.: I did send the patch before, but as I did not see the mail show >> > up > >>on the list, I resend it. >> >>Robert Shade wrote: >> >>>>Running 2.4.17.16mdk : >>>>- really use andrea vm_24. >>>> >>>> >>>I assume that you mean that you are running win4lin successfully >>> > with this > >>>kernel? (with necessary patches of course) If you are, please send >>> > me the > >>>file mm/vmscan.c (for reasons I will explain below) from your source >>> > tree to > >>>see what is going on. >>> >>>Yeah, I did look through the mandrake cvs after I posted and saw >>> > that they've > >>>been using it since then. However looking at vm_24 it looks like >>> > the > >>>collision occurs with the win4lin patch as well. >>> >>>The problem occurs in the swap_out function in the file mm/vmscan.c, >>> > in the > >>>vanilla kernel the arguments to swap_out are: >>> >>> unsigned int priority, unsigned int gfp_mask, zone_t * classzone >>> >>>however, in the aa vm_* kernel patches he made the arguments to >>> > swap_out: > >>> zone_t * classzone >>> >>>The win4lin patch uses the priority and gfp_mask variables like so: >>> >>> CALL_MKI_HOOK(MKI_HOOK_SWAP, (void *)priority, (void >>> > *)gfp_mask); > >>>as far as I can see, any kernel with the aa VM will fail to accept >>> > any > >>>win4lin patches. >>> >>>This might be on the edge of the scope of this list, but hopefully >>> > the > >>>maintainer of the kernel rpm is listening. >>> >>>Thanks. >>> >>>Robert >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > On Mon, 2002-03-18 at 22:34, Uwe Reimann wrote: > >>Hi Robert, hi list, >> >>I have a patch ready that makes the patches for win4lin compile and run >>under kernel-2.4.18-6mdk. I am not a kernel-hacker, therefore I don't >>know wether everything's done right, but, at least for me, it works. >> >>Apply the patch after applying the patches from netraverse. >> >>Regards, Uwe >> >>P.S.: I did send the patch before, but as I did not see the mail show up >>on the list, I resend it. >> >>Robert Shade wrote: >> >>>>Running 2.4.17.16mdk : >>>>- really use andrea vm_24. >>>> >>>> >>>I assume that you mean that you are running win4lin successfully with this >>>kernel? (with necessary patches of course) If you are, please send me the >>>file mm/vmscan.c (for reasons I will explain below) from your source tree to >>>see what is going on. >>> >>>Yeah, I did look through the mandrake cvs after I posted and saw that they've >>>been using it since then. However looking at vm_24 it looks like the >>>collision occurs with the win4lin patch as well. >>> >>>The problem occurs in the swap_out function in the file mm/vmscan.c, in the >>>vanilla kernel the arguments to swap_out are: >>> >>> unsigned int priority, unsigned int gfp_mask, zone_t * classzone >>> >>>however, in the aa vm_* kernel patches he made the arguments to swap_out: >>> >>> zone_t * classzone >>> >>>The win4lin patch uses the priority and gfp_mask variables like so: >>> >>> CALL_MKI_HOOK(MKI_HOOK_SWAP, (void *)priority, (void *)gfp_mask); >>> >>>as far as I can see, any kernel with the aa VM will fail to accept any >>>win4lin patches. >>> >>>This might be on the edge of the scope of this list, but hopefully the >>>maintainer of the kernel rpm is listening. >>> >>>Thanks. >>> >>>Robert >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > > > > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > >
