[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 08:05:16PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote: >> I have got an RPM for amanda (based on the RedHat one), which we are >> using in production now (with the mtx that just went in to cooker). >> Amanda has unversioned libraries though, and rpmlint gives a lot of >> errors regarding this. >> >> What should I do regarding this then? Try and patch it to have versioned >> libraries (with packages libamada[0-9] and libamanda[0-9]-devel ?) or >> leave them unversioned (with packages libamanda and libamanda-devel). >> >If you leave them unversioned then that defeats the purpose. >Can you give an example of how the libname looks like? These are the two RPMs (of the 4 amanda RPMs that are running on our production servers) that need some libification: [bgmilne bgmilne]$ rpm -qlp rpm/RPMS/i586/amanda-devel-2.4.2p2-1mdk.i586.rpm /usr/lib/libamanda.a /usr/lib/libamanda.la /usr/lib/libamclient.a /usr/lib/libamclient.la /usr/lib/libamserver.a /usr/lib/libamserver.la /usr/lib/libamtape.a /usr/lib/libamtape.la [bgmilne bgmilne]$ rpm -qlp rpm/RPMS/i586/amanda-2.4.2p2-1mdk.i586.rpm /etc/amanda /etc/amandates /usr/lib/libamanda-2.4.2p2.so /usr/lib/libamanda.so /usr/lib/libamtape-2.4.2p2.so /usr/lib/libamtape.so /usr/sbin/amrestore /usr/share/man/man8/amrestore.8.bz2 /var/lib/amanda/.amandahosts /var/lib/lib/amanda Hack the makefile? Arbitrarily name the lib package to 0? I have asked about the use of unversioned libs on the amanda mailing list to no avail so far ... Or maybe thy're just versioning them in a weird way? -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 85808 Apr 25 00:16 /usr/lib/libamanda-2.4.2p2.so* lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root 20 May 18 21:56 /usr/lib/libamanda.so -> libamanda-2.4.2p2.so* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 9532 Apr 25 00:16 /usr/lib/libamtape-2.4.2p2.so* lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root 20 May 18 21:56 /usr/lib/libamtape.so -> libamtape-2.4.2p2.so* Thanks Buchan
